Home | deutsch  | Legals | Data Protection | Sitemap | KIT

An empirical comparison of C, C++, Java, Perl, Python, Rexx, and Tcl

An empirical comparison of C, C++, Java, Perl, Python, Rexx, and Tcl
Name:

Journal Article

Year:

2000 

Author:

Lutz Prechelt

Links:PDF

Summary

80 implementations of the same set of requirements are compared for several properties, such as run time, memory consumption, source text length, comment density, program structure, reliability, and the amount of effort required for writing them. The results indicate that, for the given programming problem, which regards string manipulation and search in a dictionary, \"scripting languages\" (Perl, Python, Rexx, Tcl) are more productive than \"conventional languages\" (C, C++, Java). In terms of run time and memory consumption, they often turn out better than Java and not much worse than C or C++. In general, the differences between languages tend to be smaller than the typical differences due to different programmers within the same language.

Bibtex

@article{,
author={Lutz Prechelt},
title={An empirical comparison of C, C++, Java, Perl, Python, Rexx, and Tcl},
year=2000,
month=Oct,
volume={30},
url={https://ps.ipd.kit.edu/downloads/za_2000_empirical_comparison.pdf},
abstract={80 implementations of the same set of requirements are compared for several properties, such as run time, memory consumption, source text length, comment density, program structure, reliability, and the amount of effort required for writing them. The results indicate that, for the given programming problem, which regards string manipulation and search in a dictionary, \"scripting languages\" (Perl, Python, Rexx, Tcl) are more productive than \"conventional languages\" (C, C++, Java). In terms of run time and memory consumption, they often turn out better than Java and not much worse than C or C++. In general, the differences between languages tend to be smaller than the typical differences due to different programmers within the same language.},
number={10},
pages={23-29},
journal={IEEE Computer},
}
People involved
Title First Name Surname